Combining visual interpretation and image segmentation to derive canopy cover index from high resolution satellite imagery in functionally diverse coniferous forests
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha52113637Keywords:
forest cover, canopy gaps, IKONOS2, image segmentationAbstract
Forest canopy cover is one of the most significant structural parameters of the forest stand that can be estimated using of aerial and satellite remote sensing. Even though sub-pixel analysis can be used to estimate the index on low-resolution imagery, high-resolution imagery provides more accurate details on forest canopy variability for ecological and forestry applications. However, the high variability of the images demands a more advanced approach to canopy cover measurement than the visual interpretation of single images or stereo pairs. These traditional methods are inefficient and limited in providing a comprehensive and accurate canopy cover assessment. An improvement of the method could involve classifying high spatial resolution images, separating and extracting the areas corresponding to canopy gaps, and generating canopy cover maps. This study offers valuable insights and reveals key differences between three methods for estimating canopy cover: ground measurements, visual photo interpretation and automatic extraction from classified images using pixel and object-based methods. The texture analysis approach was used for separating the “shadow” objects corresponding to gaps in the canopy from the shades cast on the lower trees. The sample plot-based visual interpretation of the images revealed comparable results between ground and satellite image canopy cover values (correlation coefficient of 0.74 for all plots), with lower correlations (r = 0.39) for uneven-aged stands. The results encourage the use of the texture analysis method, with satisfying accuracy (forest canopy cover differences of maximum 0.06 between ground, photo interpreted and extracted datasets). The method could be further integrated with complementary data like LIDAR or hyperspectral images.
References
Anonymus (2014). ERDAS Imagine User Guide.
Anonymus (2016). Plan de Management Integrat Parcul Natural Vânători Neamţ [Romanian Integrated management plan for Vanatori Neamt Natural Park]. https://www.mmediu.ro/app/webroot/uploads/files/2016-06-06_PM_PN_VANATORI_NEAMT%282%29.pdf
Asner GP (2013). Geography of forest disturbance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110(10):3711-3712. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1300396110
Asner GP, Warner AS (2003). Canopy shadow in IKONOS satellite observations of tropical forests and savannas. Remote Sensing of Environment 87(4):521-533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2003.08.006
Barbu CO, Duduman G, Tomescu CV (2023). Variation patterns of forest structure diversity after set-aside in Rarău-Giumalău Mountains, Romania. Forests 14(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/f14020251
Barnoaiea I, Iacobescu O (2009). Using pixel and object based IKONOS image analysis for studying decay in silver fir stands. Annals of Forest Research 52(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15287/afr.2009.132
Baynes J (2007). Using FCD mapper software and Landsat images to assess forest canopy density in landscapes in Australia and the Philippines. Annals of Tropical Research 29(1):9-20.
Bos N (1973). Cercetări privind utilizarea fotogramelor aeriene în amenajarea pădurilor. Teza de doctorat (Research regarding the use of aerial photographs in forest management planning. PhD Thesis). Transilvania University, Brasov, Romania.
Bowen HS (2002). Absolute radiometric calibration of the Ikonos sensor using radiometrically characterized stellar sources. Pecora 15/Land Satellite Information IV/ISPRS Commission I/FIEOS, p. 2.
Definiens (2004). Definiens. eCognition 4.0 User Guide’. Munich.
Dial G, Bowen H, Gerlach F, Grodecki J, Oleszczuk R (2003). IKONOS satellite, imagery, and products. Remote Sensing of Environment 88(1-2):23-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2003.08.014
Florescu I, Nicolescu N (1996). Silvicultura – vol. I Studiul pădurii (Silviculture - vol. I). Brasov: Editura Lux Libris.
Franklin SE (2001). Remote Sensing for Sustainable Forest Management. CRC Press.
Fu KS, Mui JK (1981). A survey on image segmentation. Pattern Recognition 13(1):3-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-3203(81)90028-5
Griffiths P, Kuemmerle T, Baumann M, Radeloff VC, Abrudan IV, Lieskovsky J, ... Hostert P (2014). Forest disturbances, forest recovery, and changes in forest types across the Carpathian ecoregion from 1985 to 2010 based on Landsat image composites. Remote Sensing of Environment 151:72-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.04.022
Grönlund Ö, Di Fulvio F, Bergström D, Djupström L, Eliasson L, Erlandsson E, ... Korosuo A (2019). Mapping of voluntary set-aside forests intended for nature conservation management in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 34(2):133-144. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2018.1555279
Hadi F, Wikantika K (2004). Implementation of forest canopy density model to monitor forest fragmentation in Mt. Simpang and Mt. Tilu Nature Reserves, West Java, Indonesia. In: 3rd FIG Regional Conference Jakarta, Indonesia, pp 9.
Hagner O (2002). Combined estimation of forest parameters from high- and medium resolution satellite imagery and forest inventory data. In: ForestSAT Symposium Heriot Watt University, Edinburgh, August 5th -9th, 2002, pp 7.
Hansen MC, Potapov PV, Moore R, Hancher M, Turubanova SA, Tyukavina A, ... Townshend J (2013). High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342(6160):850-853. https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.1244693/SUPPL_FILE/HANSEN.SM.PDF
Horodnic S (2003). Elemente de biostatistica forestiera (Elements of forestry biostatistics). Editura Universitatii din Suceava.
de Jong SM, van der Meer FD (2004). Remote Sensing Image Analysis: Including the Spatial Domain. 2004th edn. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Knorn J, Kuemmerle T, Radeloff VC, Szabo A, Mindrescu M, Keeton WS, ... Hostert P (2012). Forest restitution and protected area effectiveness in post-socialist Romania. Biological Conservation 146(1):204-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.12.020
Lillesand T, Kiefer RW, Chipman J (2008). Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation. 6th edn. Willey.
Lobell DB, Asner GP, Law BE, Treuhaft RN (2001). Subpixel canopy cover estimation of coniferous forests in Oregon using SWIR imaging spectrometry. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 106(D6):5151-5160. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900739
Mustafa YT, Habeeb HN, Stein A, Sulaiman FY (2015). Identification and mapping of tree species in urban areas using worldview-2 imagery. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 2:175-181. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsannals-II-2-W2-175-2015
Nasiri V, Darvishsefat AA, Arefi H, Griess VC, Sadeghi SMM, Borz SA (2022). Modeling forest canopy cover: a synergistic use of Sentinel-2, aerial photogrammetry data, and machine learning. Remote Sensing 14(6):1453. https://doi.org/10.3390/RS14061453
Olofsson P, Foody GM, Herold M, Stehman SV, Woodcock CE, Wulder MA (2014). Good practices for estimating area and assessing accuracy of land change. Remote sensing of Environment 148:42-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.02.015
Pal NR, Pal SK (1993). A review on image segmentation techniques. Pattern Recognition 26(9):1277-1294. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-3203(93)90135-J
Palaghianu C (2009). Cercetări privind evaluarea regenerării arboretelor prin mijloace informatice, Teza de doctorat (Research regarding the evaluation of stand regeneration through information means. PhD Thesis). Universitatea Stefan cel Mare Suceava.
Paletto A, Tosi V (2009). Forest canopy cover and canopy closure: comparison of assessment techniques. European Journal of Forest Research 128(3):265-272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-009-0262-x
Rusu A (1978). Fotogrammetrie forestiera (Forest Photogrammetry). Bucharest: Editura Ceres.
Saei M, Abkar A (2004). Forest Canopy Density Monitoring, Using Satellite Images. In: The XXth ISPRS Congress, Istanbul, pp 65.
Shrestha DP, Suriyaprasit M (2014). Deriving land use and canopy cover factor from remote sensing and field data in inaccessible mountainous terrain for use in soil erosion modeling deriving land use and canopy cover factor from remote sensing and field data in inaccessible mountainous terr. Technical Session TS-34:SS-7 Global Monitoring for Environment and Security (GMES), (November), pp 1747-1750.
Tso B, Mather P (2009). Classification Methods for Remotely Sensed Data. (2nd ed.). CRC Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420090741
Wang K, Franklin SE, Guo X, Cattet M (2010). Remote sensing of ecology, biodiversity and conservation: a review from the perspective of remote sensing specialists. Sensors 10(11):9647-9667. https://doi.org/10.3390/s101109647
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ionuţ BARNOAIEA, Ciprian PALAGHIANU, Marian DRĂGOI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
License:
Open Access Journal:
The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restriction. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.
.png)
