Water-yield relationship of greenhouse-grown strawberry under limited irrigation


  • Harun KAMAN Akdeniz University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Structures and Irrigation, Antalya 07058 (TR)
  • Hamide GÜBBÜK Akdeniz University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Horticulture, Antalya 07058 (TR)
  • Ahmet TEZCAN Akdeniz University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Structures and Irrigation, Antalya 07058 (TR)
  • Mehmet CAN Akdeniz University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Structures and Irrigation, Antalya 07058 (TR)
  • Ömer ÖZBEK Bati Akdeniz Agricultural Research Institute, Department of Soil & Water Resources Dept, Antalya (TR)




fresh seedling, greenhouse, irrigation water productivity, partial root drying, yield response factor (ky), water-yield relations


In this study, the traditional full/deficit irrigation and partial root drying (F-PRD) techniques with the four different amounts of irrigation (100%, 80%, 60% and 40%) were examined on Rubygem Strawberry species under controlled greenhouse conditions, in terms of yield, yield parameters, WUE, IWUE, yield response factor (ky), etc. and their possible reactions have been investigated. In the study in which fresh seedlings were used, planted on the rows in a triangular form at intervals of 20×20 cm in double rows. Irrigation applications were carried out by drip irrigation method and the amount of irrigation water in the control treatment (I100) was calculated using measurements taken from an A-Class evaporation pan. Eight irrigation treatments including four traditional irrigation (I100, I80, I60, I40) and four fixed-partial root drying (F-PRD100, F-PRD80, F-PRD60, F-PRD40) were examined within the scope of the study. In traditional irrigation (I100, I80, I60, I40) applications, both sides of the plant root zone were irrigated. However, during the entire growing season in the fixed-partial root drying (F-PRD100, F-PRD80, F-PRD60, F-PRD40) technique, one-half of the plant root zone was kept wet, and the other half was left relatively dry. The yield values were ranked as, from high to low, F-PRD100>I100>F-PRD80>I80>F-PRD60>I60>I40>F-PRD40. In irrigation treatments, the yield values obtained from I80 and F-PRD80 treatments were statistically similar (Duncan 5%) to the yield values of I100 and F-PRD100 treatments. However, it could be stated that the F-PRD80 is more advantageous. It was found that different amounts of irrigation water (100%, 80%, 60% and 40%) affects the yield and yield-related parameters obtained from the strawberry plants. In general, as the water deficit increased (in the I40 and F-PRD40 treatments), the level of negative impact also increased. As a result of the research, F-PRD80 was proposed for the cultivation of strawberries, particularly, in arid and semi-arid regions, depending on the availability of water.


Aaby K, Ekeberg D, Skrede G (2007). Characterization of phenolic compounds in strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa) fruits by different HPLC detectors and contribution of individual compounds to total antioxidant capacity. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry 55(11):4395-4406. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0702592

Anonymous (1998). 1997 work report. (in Turkish), T.C. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Provincial Directorate of Agriculture, Antalya, pp 71.

Berk S (2013). Determination of yield and quality characteristics of some strawberries cultivars grown organically in Bolu (Mudurnu) ecological conditions. Tarım Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi 6(1):68-72.

Cetin M, Kaman H, Kirda C, Sesveren S (2020). Analysis of irrigation performance in water resources planning and management: A case study. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin 29(5):3409-3414.

Chaffey N (2001). Restricting water supply enhances crop growth. Trends in Plant Science 6(8):346.

Çeliktopuz E, Kapur B, Sarıdaş MA, Paydaş Kargı S, Özekici B (2017). Effects of different irrigation levels with bioactivator applications on eco–physicological characteristics in strawberry. Bahçe-Journal of Atatürk Central Horticultural Research Institute 46(1):79-87.

Çeliktopuz E (2019). The effects of different irrigation levels and bio-activator application on yield, fruit quality and nutrient contents in two strawberry varieties. Çukurova University, Agricultural Structures and Irrigation Science Department, PhD Thesis, pp 327.

Ding CK, Chachin K, Yoshinori UY, Imahori Y, Wang CY (2001). Metabolism of phenolic compounds during loquat fruit development. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 49:2883-2888. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0101253

Doorenbos J, Kassam AH (1979). Yield response to water. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No, 33, Rome, pp 193.

DSİ (2022). 2021 annual report. Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, General Directorate of State Water Works.

FAOSTAT (2020). Retrieved 2020 August 1st from: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/Q

Giné-Bordonaba J, Terry LA (2010). Manipulating the taste-related composition of strawberry fruits (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) from different cultivars using deficit irrigation. Food Chemistry 122(4):1020-1026. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.03.060

Giné-Bordonaba J, Terry LA (2016). Effect of deficit irrigation and methyl jasmonate application on the composition of strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa) fruit and leaves. Scientia Horticulturae 199:63-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.12.026

Herrington ME, Chandler CK, Moisander JA, Reid CE (2007). ‘Rubygem’ strawberry. HortScience 42(6):1482-1483. http://dx.doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.42.6.1482

Hoppula KI, Salo TJ (2007). Tensiometer-based irrigation scheduling in perennial strawberry cultivation. Irrigation Science 25(4):401-409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00271-006-0055-7

Kaman H, Kirda C, Cetin M, Topcu S (2006). Salt accumulation in the root zones of tomato and cotton irrigated with partial root-drying technique. Irrigation and Drainage 55:533-544. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ird.276

Kaman H, Cetin M, Kırda C (2016) Spatial and temporal evaluation of depth and salinity of the groundwater in a large irrigated area in southern Turkey. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences 53(2):473-480. http://dx.doi.org/10.21162/PAKJAS/16.3423

Kaman H, Cetin M, Kirda C (2017). Monitoring and assessment of irrigation management in a large irrigation project area. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin 26(6):3986-3994.

Kaman H, Özbek Ö (2021). Performance evaluation of PR2 in determination of soil water content. Yuzuncu Yil University Journal of Agricultural Sciences 31(3):543-550. https://doi.org/10.29133/yyutbd.878567

Kaman H, Özbek Ö, Polat E (2022). Response of greenhouse grown cucumber to partial root zone drying and conventional deficit irrigation. Ksu Tarim Ve Doga Dergisi-Ksu Journal of Agriculture and Nature 25(2):337-347. http://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.883294

Kang S, Liang Z, Hu W, Zhang J (1998). Water use efficiency of controlled alternate irrigation on root-divided maize plants. Agricultural Water Management 38:69-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3774(98)00048-1

Kapur B, Şahiner Y (2019). Effects of irrigation levels and mulch applications on pomological properties of strawberry. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology 7(2):355-364. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v7i2.355-364.2332

Kapur B, Çeliktopuz E, Sarıdaş MA, Paydaş Kargı S (2018). Irrigation regimes and bio-stimulant application effects on yield and morpho-physiological responses of strawberry. Horticultural Science and Technology 36(3):313-325. https://doi.org/10.12972/kjhst.20180031

Kirda C, Cetin M, Dasgan Y, Topcu S, Kaman H, Ekici B, Derici MR, Ozguven AI (2004). Yield response of greenhouse grown tomato to partial root drying and conventional deficit irrigation. Agricultural Water Management 69:191-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2004.04.008

Kirda C, Topcu S, Kaman H, Ulger AC, Yazici A, Cetin M, Derici MR (2005). Grain yield response and N-fertiliser recovery of maize under deficit irrigation. Field Crops Research 93:132-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2004.09.015

Klamkowski K, Treder W, Wojcik K (2015). Effects of lon-term water stress on leaf gas exchange, growth and yield of three strawberry cultivars. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Hortorum Cultus 14(6):55-65.

Köksal ES, Cemek B, Artık C, Temizel KE, Taşan M (2011). A new approach for neutron moisture meter calibration: Artificial neural network. Irrigation Science 29:369-377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00271-010-0246-0

Kumar S, Dey P (2012). Influence of soil hydrothermal environment, irrigation regime, and different mulches on the growth and fruit quality of strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa L.) plants in a sub-temperate climate. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 87(4):374-380. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2012.11512879

Lozano D, Ruiz N, Gavilan P (2016). Consumptive water use and irrigation performance of strawberries. Agricultural Water Management 169:44-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2016.02.011

Määttä KR, Kamal-Eldin A, Törrönen AR (2003). High- performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis of phenolic compounds in berries with diode array and electrospray ionization mass spectrometric (MS) detection: Ribes species. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry 51:6736-6744. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0347517

Määtta KR, Kamal-Eldin A, Törrönen AR (2004). Identification and quantification of phenolic compounds in berries of Fragaria and Rubus species (family Rosaceae). Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry 52:6178-6187. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf049450r

Mattila P, Hellstrom J, Törrönen R (2006). Phenolic acids in berries, fruits, and beverages. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry 54:7193-7199. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0615247

Monda D (2017). Possibility of strawberry cultivation in Bangladesh: An assignment on strawberry. Department of Business Administration, Northern University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Nezhadahmadi A, Faruq G, Rashid K (2015). The impact of drought stress on morphological and physiological parameters of three strawberry varieties in different growing conditions. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences 52(1):79-92.

Oğuz Hİ, Kıroğlu Zorlugenç F, Zorlugenç B, Kafkas E (2017). Determination of fruit quality characteristics of some strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa L.) cultivars grown in Nevşehir climate conditions. Bahçe-Journal of Atatürk Central Horticultural Research Institute 46(Special Ed. 1):303-310.

Öz AT, Kafkas E (2015). Determination of the effects of storage time on physical parameter and biochemical composition of ‘Festival’ strawberry cultivar. Yüzüncü Yil Üniversitesi Journal of Agricultural Sciences 25(2):105-112.

Rannu RP, Ahmed R, Siddiky A, Yousuf Ali ASMd, Ibn Murad KF, Sarkar PK (2018). Effect of irrigation and mulch on the yield and water use of strawberry. Hindawi-International Journal of Agronomy 2903706. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2903706

Sarı M, Aksoy T, Köseoğlu T, Kaplan M, Kılıç Ş, Pilanalı N (1993). Akdeniz Üniversitesi yerleşim alanının detaylı toprak etüdü ve ideal arazi kullanım planlaması. (in Turkish). Akdeniz Üniv. Yayınları, Antalya, pp 145.

Sarıdaş MA, Kapur B, Çeliktopuz E, Paydaş Kargı S (2017a). Irrigation regimes and bio-stimulant application effects on fruit quality features at ‘Rubygem’ strawberry variety. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology 5(10):1221-1227. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v5i10.1221-1227.1389

Sarıdas MA, Paydas Kargi S, Kapur B, Celiktopuz E (2017b). Effect of the bioactivator application on fruit quality under different irrigation regime in ‘Kabarla’ strawberry variety. American Journal of Plant Biology 2(5):114-119. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpb.20170203.15

Sarıdaş MA, Kapur B, Çeliktopuz E, Şahiner Y, Paydaş Kargı S (2021). Land productivity, irrigation water use efficiency and fruit quality under various plastic mulch colors and irrigation regimes of strawberry in the eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey. Agricultural Water Management 245:106568. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106568

Seeram PN, Lee R, Scheuller SH, Heber D (2006). Identification of phenolic compounds in strawberries by liquid chromatography electrospray ionization mass spectroscopy. Food Chemistry 97:1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.02.047

Sevinç Ş (2019). Effects of different growing media and irrigation programs on yield and water consumption of strawberry grown in soilless culture. Ege University, MSc in Agricultural Structures and Irrigation. Pp 119.

Simirgiotis MJ, Theoduloz C, Caligari PDS, Schmeda-Hirschmann G (2009). Comparison of phenolic composition and antioxidant properties of two native Chilean and one domestic strawberry genotypes. Food Chemistry 113(2):377-385. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.07.043

Stewart JI, Cuenca RH, Pruitt WO, Hagan RM, Tosso J (1977). Determination and utilization of water production functions for principal California crops. W-67 CA Contributing Project Report, University of California, Davis, USA.

Şahiner Y (2019). The effects of mulch applications with different irrigation levels on yield, pomological, morphological, physiological and biochemical characteri̇stics in strawberry plant. Çukurova University, Agricultural Structures and Irrigation Science Department, MSc. Thesis, pp 87.

Terry AL, Chope AG, Bordonaba GJ (2009). Effect of water deficit irrigation on strawberry (Fragaria × Ananassa) fruit quality. ISHS Acta Horticulturae 842. VI International Strawberry Symposium. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2009.842.185

Yavuz D, Seymen M, Yavuz N, Çoklar H, Ercan M (2021). Effects of water stress applied at various phenological stages on yield, quality, and water use efficiency of melon. Agricultural Water Management 246:106673. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106673

Yuan BZ, Sun J, Nishiyama S (2004). Effect of drip irrigation on strawberry growth and yield inside a plastic greenhouse. Biosystems Engineering 87:237-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2003.10.014



How to Cite

KAMAN, H., GÜBBÜK, H., TEZCAN, A., CAN, M., & ÖZBEK, Ömer. (2023). Water-yield relationship of greenhouse-grown strawberry under limited irrigation. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 51(2), 13235. https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha51213235



Research Articles
DOI: 10.15835/nbha51213235