Investigation of the effects of some bacterial isolates and fertilizer applications on nutrient contents of hyacinth

Pınar A. BINTAS; Arzu ÇIĞ; Nalan  TÜRKOĞLU

doi:10.15835/nbha48211911

Authors

Pınar A. BINTAS Siirt University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Horticulture, Kezer, Siirt (TR)
Arzu ÇIĞ Siirt University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Horticulture, Kezer, Siirt (TR)
Nalan TÜRKOĞLU Van Yüzüncü Yıl University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Horticulture, Van (TR)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha48211911

Keywords:

Bioorganic fertilization; flowering; Hyacinthus orientalis; inorganic fertilization; nutrient element content; PGPB

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the effect of NPK fertilization and some bacterial species on the macro and micro nutrient element contents of Hyacinthus orientalis cv. ‘Delft Blue’ leaves and bulbs. In the study carried out under laboratory conditions, according to randomized plot experiment design, full and 50% dose of 20:20:20 NPK commercial fertilizer was applied to hyacinth bulbs as inorganic fertilizer. Nitrogen-fixing bacteria: Cellulomonas turbata (TV54A), phosphate solibilizing bacteria: Bacillus-GC Group (TV119E), nitrogen-fixing and phosphate solibilizing bacteria: Kluyvera cryocrescens (TV113C)were used as biological fertilizers. In this study, the highest mean values of nutrients were obtained as nitrogen (N) 3.866%; phosphorus (P) 334.790 mgkg^-1;potassium (K) 4.534%; iron (Fe) 152.453 mgkg^-1; manganese (Mn) 26.739 mgkg^-1; zinc (Zn) 46.517 mgkg^-1and copper (Cu) 8.902 mgkg^-1 (P <0.01) in hyacinth leaves, while calcium (Ca) was 1064.95 mgkg^-1and magnesium (Mg) was found 1992.92 mgkg^-1, and the difference between the mean values for these two elements was not statistically significant. The highest N, P, Zn and Cu contents of the leaf were obtained by using full dose NPK. The highest mean values of nutrient elements in hyacinth bulbs were 4.382%; P 278.496 mgkg^-1; K, 2.203%; Ca 2322.045 mgkg^-1; Mg 1884.164 mgkg^-1; Mn 39.640 mgkg^-1; Zn was obtained as 40.861 mgkg^-1 and Cu 7.683 mgkg^-1, whereas Fe was found to have an average value of 140.545 mgkg^-1. In the process of bacteria inoculation K, Ca and Mg content of inoculation; N, P, Mn, Zn and Cu content of ½ NPK fertilization was determined to be effective.

References

Arias A (2000). Plant growth promoting microorganisms in Uruguay: status and prospects, In: Proceedings of the Fifth International PGPR Workshop, Cordoba, Argentina.

Bashir M, Asif M, Naveed M, Qadri RWK, Faried N, Baksh A (2019). Pre-harvest exogenous application of bacterial strains to assess the flower and bulb quality of cut tulip (Tulipa gesneriana L.) cv. ‘Clear Water’. Discovery 55(278):73-80.

Bøckman OC (1997). Fertilizers and biological nitrogen fixation as sources of plant nutrients: perspectives for future agriculture. Plant Soil 194:11-14.

Chen Y, Mei R, Lu S, Liu L, Kloepper JW (1996). The use of yield increasing bacteria (yib) as plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in Chinese agriculture. Management of soil borne diseases. Utkhede RS, Gupta VK (Eds). Kalyani Publishers, Ludhiada, New Delhi, pp 165-184.

Clark DS (1965). Method for estimating the bacterial population on surfaces. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 11(3):407-413. https://doi.org/10.1139/m65-054

Çakmakçi R, Dönmez F, Aydın A, Şahin F (2006). Growth promotion of plants by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria under greenhouse and two different field soil conditions. Soil Biology Biochemistry 38(6):1482-1487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.09.019

Çığ A, Çığ F (2019). The effect of some PGPBs on post-harvest weight, length and width of Hyacinth bulbs planted in different areas. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Food, Agriculture and Animal Sciences (ICOFAAS 2019) Antalya, Turkey pp 258-268.

Düzgünes O, Kesici T, Kavuncu O, Gürbüz F (1987). Araştırma ve deneme metotları, Yayın No: 1021, Ders Kitabı: 295, A.Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları, Ankara, 381. (in Turkish)

Egamberdiyeva D (2007). The effect of plant growth promoting bacteria on growth and nutrient uptake of maize in two different soils. Applied Soil Ecology 36(23):184-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2007.02.005

Egamberdiyeva D, Höflich G (2003). Influence of growth promoting bacteria on the growth of wheat in different soils and temperatures. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 35:973-978. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(03)00158-5

Eid AR, Awad MN, Hamouda HA (2009). Evaluate effectiveness of bio and mineral fertilization on the growth parameters and marketable cut flowers of Matthiola incana L. American-Eurasian Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Science 5(4):509-518.

Ekinci M, Dursun A, Kotan R, Güneş A (2016). Azot fikseri ve fosfat çözücü bakteri izolatlarının farklı lale çeşitlerinde oluşan soğan sayısı ve bazı bitkisel özellikleri üzerine etkilerinin incelenmesi, TÜBİTAK Proje Sonuç Raporu. Program Kodu: 1001. Proje No: 1130957. (in Turkish)

Erman M, Kotan R, Çakmakçı R, Çığ F, Karagöz K, Sezen M (2010). Effect of nitrogen fixing and phosphate-solubilizing rhizobacteria isolated from Van Lake Basin on the growth and quality properties in wheat and sugar beet. In: Proceedings of the Turkey IV. Organic Farming Symposium, Erzurum, Turkey, pp 325-329.

Kacar B, İnal A (2008). Bitki analizleri. Nobel Yayın, No: 1241, Fen Bilimleri: 63. (in Turkish)

Kleopper JW, Schroth MN (1978). Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on radishes. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Plant Pathogenic Bacteria 2:879-882.

Kloepper JW (1993). Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biological control agents. Soil Microbial Ecology. F Blaşne Metting J (Ed.) Marcel Dekker, Inc. New York pp 255-274.

Lemanceau P, Steinberg C, Thomas DJI, Edel V, Raaijmakers J, Alabouvette C (2000). Natural soil suppressiveness to soilborne diseases. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International PGPR Workshop, Cordoba, Argentina.

Lucas Garcia JA, Probanza A, Ramos B, Ruiz Palomino N, Gutierrez Manero FJ (2000). Effects of inoculation with PGPR on seedling growth of different tomato and pepper varieties in axenic conditions. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International PGPR Workshop, Cordoba, Argentina.

Luz WC (2000). Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in graminicolous crops in Brazil. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International PGPR Workshop, Cordoba, Argentina.

Meena P, Rai A (2017). Effect of PGPR on morphological properties of different varieties of wheat (Triticum aestivum). The Pharma Innovation 6(7):271-277. https://doi.org/10.4236/aim.2016.69067

Parewa HP, Yadav J, Rakshit A, Meena VS, Karthikeyan N (2014). Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria enhance growth and nutrient uptake of crops. Agriculture for Sustainable Development 2(2):101-116.

Parlakova Karagöz F, Dursun A, Kotan R (2019). Effects of rhizobacteria on plant development, quality of flowering and bulb mineral contents in Hyacinthus orientalis L. Alinteri Journal of Agriculture Sciences 34(1):88-95. https://doi.org/10.28955/alinterizbd.585219

Parlakova Karagöz F, Dursun A, Kotan R, Ekinci M, Yildirim E, Mohammadi P (2016). Assessment of the effects of some bacterial isolates and hormones on corm formation and some plant properties in saffron (Crocus sativus L.). Ankara University Journal of Agricultural Sciences 22(4):500-511.

Parmar N, Dadarwal KR (2000). Pathogenic suppressive abilities of rhizosphere bacteria from healthy chickpea plants. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International PGPR Workshop, Cordoba, Argentina.

Romerio RS (2000). Preliminary results on PGPR research at the Universidade Federal De Viçosa, Brazil. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International PGPR Workshop, Cordoba, Argentina.

Saber MSM (2001). Clean biotechnology for sustainable farming. Engineering Life Sciences 1:217-223. https://doi.org/10.1002/1618-2863(200112)1:6<217::AID-ELSC217>3.0.CO;2-Y

Shen J, Li R, Zhang F, Fan J, Tang C, Rengel Z (2004). Crop yields, soil fertility and phosphorus fractions in response to long-term fertilization under rice monoculture system on a calcareous soil. Field Crops Research 86:225-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2003.08.013

Sonkurt M, Çığ F (2019). The effect of plant growth-promoting bacteria on the development, yield and yield components of bread (Triticum aestivum L.) and durum (Triticum durum) wheats. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research 17(2):3877-3896. http://dx.doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1702_38773896

Soussi A, Ferjani R, Marasco R, Guesmi A, Cherif H, Rolli E, … Cherif A (2016). Plant-associated microbiomes in arid lands: Diversity, ecology and biotechnological potential. Plant and Soil 405(1-2):357-370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-015-2650-y

Söğüt S, Çığ F (2019). Determination of the effect of plant growth promoting bacteria on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) development under salinity stress conditions. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research 17(1):1129-1141. https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1701_11291141

Şahin F, Çakmakçi R, Kantar F (2004). Sugar beet and barley yields in relation to inoculation with N2-fixing and phosphate solubilizing bacteria. Plant and Soil 265:123-129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-005-0334-8

Wall LG (2000). Consequences of an overview on PGPR work in Argentina: The field should be wider. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International PGPR Workshop, Cordoba, Argentina.

Zare M, Ordookhani K, Alizadeh O (2011). Effects of PGPR and AMF on growth of two bred cultivars of tomato. Advances in Environmental Biology 5(8):2177-2181.