Comparison of European Archaeophyte lists in the light of distribution data

  • Károly ECSERI John von Neumann University, Faculty of Horticulture and Rural Development, Department of Horticulture, 1-3, Mészöly Gyula Square 6000, Kecskemét
  • Péter HONFI Szent István University, Faculty of Horticultural Science, Institute of Sustainable Horticulture, Department of Floriculture and Dendrology, 29-43. Villányi Street, 1118, Budapest
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha48111812
Keywords: archaeobotany, chorology, phytogeography, segetal plants, taxonomy

Abstract

Currently is not available a complex archaeophyte definition based on the same criteria in Europe, and it cause significant anomalies between neighbouring countries. The main aim of our work was to provide the criteria which based on the available lists and chorological information. For this purpose, the archaeophyte flora of 15 European countries was compared in our research. The list of available resources has been revised and completed, taking into account the distribution data of the species. The lists were merged to contain 560 species. The majority of the plants in the merged list belong to the Asteraceae and Poaceae families with 74 and 55 species, respectively. The Chenopodium genus is characterized by the most frequent occurrence (14 species). More than half of the plants are annual and 151 species belong to Eurasian geoelements. The greatest numbers of species were observed in Crete (461 species) and Greece (460 species) and the smallest numbers were observed in Ireland (240 species) and England (241 species). In case of individual countries, plants with composite flowers, annual life form and Eurasian elements represent the highest volume, but the number of southern geoelements is also significant. All lists included anaecophytes archaeophytes. Comparison of revised lists showed 83-99% similarity. Using with this method can be formed an international archaeophyte database, which based on phytogeographical distribution and helps future researchers.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Anastasiu P, Negrean G (2005). Alien plants in Romania (I). Analele Stiinţifice ale Universităţii “Al. I. Cuza” Iaşi 51:87-96.

Andreasen C, Skovgaard M (2009). Crop and soil factors of importance for the distribution of plant species on arable fields in Denmark. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 133:61-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2009.05.003

Arianoutsou M, Bazos I, Delipetrou P, Kokkoris Y (2010). The alien flora of Greece: taxonomy, life traits and habitat preferences. Biological Invasions 12:3525-3549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-010-9749-0

Balogh L (2003). Az adventív-terminológia s. l. négynyelvű segédszótára, egyben javaslat egyes szakszavak magyar megfelelőinek használatára [A quadrilingual auxiliary-dictionary of adventive-terminology s. l., and proposals for the use of certain terms in Hungarian]. Botanikai Közlemények 90:65-93.

Brun C (2009). Biodiversity changes in highly anthropogenic environments (cultivated and ruderal) since the Neolithic in eastern France. Holocene 19:861-871. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0959683609336559

Celesti-Grapow L, Alessandrini A, Arrigoni PV, Banfi E, Bernardo L, Bovio M, … Blasi C (2009). Inventory of the non-native flora of Italy. Plant Biosystems 143:386-430. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263500902722824

Celesti-Grapow L, Alessandrini A, Arrigoni PV, Assini S, Banfi E, Barni E, … Blasi C (2010). Non-native flora of Italy: Species distribution and threats. Plant Biosystems 144:12-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263500903431870

Cin D'Agata C, Skoula M, Brundu G (2009). A preliminary inventory of the alien flora of Crete (Greece). Bocconea 23:301-315.

Comin S, Poldini L (2009). Archaeophytes: Decline and dispersal - a behavioural analysis of a fascinating group of species. Plant Biosystems 143:46-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263500903192159

Erhardt W, Götz E, Bödeker N, Seybold S (2008). Der Große Zander Enzyklopädie der Pflanzennamen. Band 2: Arten und Sorten [The great Zander encyclopaedia of plant names. Book 2: Species and varieties]. Eugen Ulmer KG, Stuttgart.

Erhardt W, Götz E, Bödeker N, Seybold S (2002). Zander. Handwörterbuch der Pflanzennamen [Dictionary of plant names]. 17. Auflage. Eugen Ulmer GmbH, Stuttgart.

Euro+Med PlantBase (2006). The information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. Retrieved 2018 February 20 from http://ww2.bgbm.org/EuroPlusMed/

Fried G, Petit S, Reboud X (2010). A specialist-generalist classification of the arable flora and its response to changes in agricultural practices. BMC Ecology 10:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6785-10-20

GBIF.org (2019). Global Biodiversity Information Facility. Retrieved 2019 November 19 from https://www.gbif.org/

Glemnitz M, Hoffmann J, Radics L, Czimber L (2004). Composition of weed floras in different agricultural management systems within European climatic gradient. In: 6th EWRS Workshop on Physical and Cultural Weed Control. Hedmark University College, Lillehammer, Norway pp 58-68.

Hajnalová E, Hunková E, Šteffek J (1993). Nálezy organických zvyškov získaných preplavovaním a analýzou odtlačkov [Finds of organic remnants obtained by rinsing and analyses of imprints]. In: Hanuliak M, Kuzma I, Šalkovský P (Eds). Mužla-Čenkov I Osídlenie z 9.–12. storočia [Mužla-Čenkov I. Settlement from 9th to 12th Century]. Materialia Archaeologica Slovaca, Nitra pp 101-133.

Hofmeister H, Garve E (2006). Lebensraum Acker [Habitats of field]. Parey Buch Verlag, Berlin.

Hyvönen T, Huusela-Veistola E (2008). Arable weeds as indicators of agricultural intensity - a case study of Finland. Biological Conservation 141:2857-2864. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.08.022

Jogan J, Bačič M, Krajšek SS (2012). Tujerodne in invazivne rastline v Sloveniji [Non-native and invasive plants in Slovenia]. In: Jogan J, Bačič M, Krajšek SS (Eds). Neobiota Slovenije, končno poročilo projekta [Neobiota of Slovenia, final project report]. Oddelek za biologijo [Department of Biology] Ljubljana pp 161-182.

Király G (Ed) (2009). Új magyar füvészkönyv. Magyarország hajtásos növényei. Határozókulcsok [New Hungarian Herbal. Vascular plants of Hungary. Taxonomic keys]. Aggteleki Nemzeti Park Igazgatóság [Aggtelek National Park], Jósvafő.

Kovács P, Szigeti B (Eds) (2007). Földrajzi világatlasz [Geographic World Atlas]. Cartographia kft., Budapest.

Lososová Z, Chytrỷ M, Kühn I, Hájek O, Horáková V, Pysek P, Lubomír Tichỷ (2006). Patterns of plants traits in annual vegetation of man-made habitats in central Europe. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 8:69-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppees.2006.07.001

Maslo S, Abadžić S (2015). Vascular flora of the town of Bragaj (south Bosnia and Herzegovina). Natura Croatica 24(1):59-92. https://doi.org/10.20302/NC.2015.24.4

Maslo S (2014a). Alien flora of Hutovo Blato Natural Park (South Bosnia and Herzegovina). Herbologia 14(1):1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.5644/Herb.14.1.01

Maslo S (2014b). The urban flora of the city of Mostar (Bosnia and Herzegovina). Natura Croatica 23:101-145.

Medvecká J, Kliment J, Májeková J, Halada Ľ, Zaliberová M, Gojdičová E, … Jarolímek I (2012). Inventory of alien flora of Slovakia. Preslia 84:257-309.

Meusel H, Jäger E, Weinert E (1965). Vergleichende Chorologie der zentraleuropäischen Flora [Comparative chorology of Central European flora]. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena.

Nikolić T (2018). Flora Croatica Database. Zagreb: Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb. Retrieved 2018 February 25 from http://hirc.botanic.hr/fcd

Ööpik M, Kukk T, Kull K, Kull T (2008). The importance of human mediation in species establishment: analysis of the alien flora of Estonia. Boreal Environment Research 13:53-67.

Pinke Gy, Pál R (2005). Gyomnövények eredete, termőhelye és védelme [Origin, habitat and protection of weeds]. Alexandra Kiadó, Szeged.

Preston CD, Pearman DA, Hall AR (2004). Archaeophytes in Britain. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 145:257-294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2004.00284.x

Protopopova VV, Shevera MV (2014). Ergasiophytes of the Ukrainian flora. Biodiversity Research and Conservation 35(1):31-46. https://doi.org/10.2478/biorc-2014-0018

Pykälä J (1998). Onko Suomessa sata vai kaksisataa muinaistulokaskasvia [100 or 200 archaeophytes in the flora of Finland]? Lutukka 14:5-57.

Pysek P, Danihelka J, Sádlo J, Chrtek J Jr, Chytrý M, Jarošík V … Tichý L (2012). Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic (2nd edition): Checklist update, taxonomic diversity and invasion patterns. Preslia 84:155-255.

Richner NA (2014). Changes in arable weed communities over the last 100 years. PhD Dissertation, Universität Zürich, Zürich.

Sarajlic N, Jogan N (2017). Alien flora of the city of Sarajevo (Bosnia and Herzegovina). Biologica Nyssana 8:129-136. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1135952

Simon T (2000). A magyarországi edényes flóra határozója [Vascular flora of Hungary]. Harasztok - virágos növények [Ferns and flowering plants]. Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó, Budapest.

Soó R (1964-1985). A magyar flóra és vegetáció rendszertani-növényföldrajzi kézikönyve - Synopsis systematico-geobotanica florae vegetationisque Hungariae I-VII [A taxonomic-phytogeographical handbook of Hungarian flora and vegetation]. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest.

Stevens PF (2017). Angiosperm Phylogeny Website. Version 14. Retrieved 2018 March 1 from http://www.mobot.org/MOBOT/research/APweb/

Suominen J, Hämet-Ahti L (1993). Archaeophytes in the flora of Finland. Norrlinia 4:1-90.

Terpó A, Zając M, Zając A (1999). Provisional list of Hungarian archeophytes. Thaiszia 9:41-47.

The International Plant Names Index (2012). Retrieved 2018 June 16 from https://www.ipni.org

The Plant List (2013). Version 1.1. Retrieved 2019 January 23 from http://www.theplantlist.org/

Tokarska-Guzik B, Węgrzynek B, Urbisz A, Urbisz A, Nowak T, Bzdęga K (2010). Alien vascular plants in the Silesian Upland of Poland: distribution, patterns, impacts and threats. Biodiversity Research and Conservation 19:33-54. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10119-010-0019-x

Verloove P (2006). Catalogue of neophytes in Belgium (1800-2005). Scripta Botanica Belgica 39:1-89.

Wąsowicz P (2018). The first attempt to list the archaeophytes of Iceland. Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae 87(4):3608. https://doi.org/10.5586/asbp.3608

Williamson M, Stout JC, Dehren-Schmutz K, Milbau A, Hall AR (2008). A provisional list of Irish archaeophytes. Irish Naturalists’ Journal 29:30-35.

Zając M, Zając A, Tokarska-Guzik B (2009). Extinct and endangered archaeophytes and the dinamics of their diversity in Poland. Biodiversity Research and Conservation 13(1):17-24. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10119-009-0004-4

NBHA vol 48(1)
Published
2020-03-31
How to Cite
ECSERI, K., & HONFI, P. (2020). Comparison of European Archaeophyte lists in the light of distribution data. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 48(1), 480-491. https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha48111812
Issue
Vol 48 No 1 (2020)
Section
Research Articles

Copyright (c) 2020 Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

License:

© Articles by the authors; licensee UASVM and SHST, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Papers published in the journal Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca are open access distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses).

Open Access Journal:

The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restriction. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.