Assessment of Some Sweet Cherry Cultivars in Comparison with Their Genitors under the Conditions of the North-Eastern Area of Romania


  • Elena IUREA Research Station for Fruit Growing, 175 Voinesti Str., 707305 Iaşi (RO)
  • Sorina SIRBU Research Station for Fruit Growing, 175 Voinesti Str., 707305 Iaşi (RO)
  • Margareta CORNEANU Research Station for Fruit Growing, 175 Voinesti Str., 707305 Iaşi (RO)
  • Mădălina BUTAC Research Institute for Fruit Growing Piteşti, 117450 Mărăcineni (RO)
  • Irina TITIRICĂ Research Institute for Fruit Growing Piteşti, 117450 Mărăcineni (RO)
  • Mădălina MILITARU Research Institute for Fruit Growing Piteşti, 117450 Mărăcineni (RO)



breeding, gallic acid, genotypes, fruit, quality


Starting with 1981, the objectives of the breeding programmes in the Research Station for Fruit Growing (RSFG) Iaşi, Romania, took into consideration the on-going improvement of the sweet cherry assortment with cultivars having fruit-bearing precocity, with great productions, self-fertile, with decreased trees’ vigour, crown compactness, resistant to anthracnose, monilia, frost and fruit’s cracking, flowering lateness, superior quality of the fruits and ripening time at the extremities of the sweet cherries’ maturation season. As a result of the breeding programmes that took place up till present at RSFG Iaşi, 28 new sweet cherry cultivars, obtained through controlled hybridization, free pollination and conservative clonal selection, were homologated during 1994-2017. The present results refer to a study led during 2015-2017, having as biological material nine sweet cherry cultivars (‘Cetăţuia’, ‘Cătălina’, ‘Golia’, ‘Bucium’, ‘Ştefan’, ‘Iaşirom’, ‘Oana’, ‘Radu’ and ‘Ludovan’) obtained through controlled hybridization. The comparision of the cultivars has been performed versus their genitors ‘Van’ (♀) and ‘Boambe de Cotnari’(♂). There have been taken observations and determinations concerning the trees’ vigour, resistance to frost and anthracnosis, the main growing and fructification phenophases, physical and chemical treats of the fruit. The highest values regarding fruit’s weight (7.5-8.9 g) have been recorded for the ‘Ludovan’, ‘Bucium’, ‘Ştefan’, ‘Iaşirom’ and ‘Golia’ cultivars, while the values of the soluble substance content have been between 15.20-19.25 °Brix, the titratable acidity has been between 0.455-0.764 g malic acid 100 mL-1 of fresh juice and the total content of polyphenols has recorded values between 97.41-574.95 mg GAE 100 mL-1 of fresh juice. The hybridization between ‘Van’ and ‘Boambe de Cotnari’ has allowed the obtaining of valuable cultivars, that got remarked by earliness (‘Cetăţuia’, ‘Cătălina’), decreased trees’ vigour (‘Ştefan’, ‘Golia’), particular quality of the fruits (‘Ludovan’, ‘Iaşirom’, ‘Golia’, ‘Bucium’, ‘Ştefan’, ‘Oana’, ‘Radu’) and resistance to diseases and frost (‘Bucium’, ‘Iaşirom’).


Bieniek A, Kawecki Z, Kopytowski J, Zielenkiewicz J (2011). Yielding and fruit quality of Lithuanian sweet cherry cultivars grown under the climatic and soil conditions of Warmia. Folia Horticulturae 23(2):101-106.

Budan S, Balaci R, Petre L (1997). Genetic breeding achievements in cherry and sour cherry tree. In: Romanian contributions in genetic breeding of cultivars and rootstocks of fruit growing tree, small fruits and strawberry (1951-1996) [in Romanian]. Pite?ti.

Budan S, Gradinariu G (2000). The cherry tree [in Romanian]. Ed Ion Ionescu de la Brad, Ia?i.

Cociu V, Oprea S (1989). Research methods in fruit tree breeding [in Romanian]. Ed Dacia, Cluj-Napoca.

Cociu V, Botu I, Serboiu L (1999). Progress in breeding of horticultural plants in Romania [in Romanian]. Ed Ceres, Bucure?ti.

Chaovanalikit A, Wrolstad RE (2004). Total anthocyanins and total phenolics of fresh and processed cherries and their antioxidant properties. Journal of Food Science 69(1):C67-72.

Crisosto CH, Crisosto GM, Ritenour MA (2002). Testing the reliability of skin color as an indicator of quality for early season ‘Brooks’ (Prunus avium L) cherry. Postharvest Biology and Technology 24:147-154.

Darbyshire R, Webb L, Goodwin I, Barlow EWR (2012). Evaluation of recent trends in Australian pome fruit spring phenology. International Journal of Biometeorology 57(3):409-421.

Demirsoy H, Demirsoy L (2004). Characteristics of some local sweet cherry cultivars from homeland. Journal of Agronomy 3:88-89.

Faniadis D, Drogoudi PD, Vasilakakis M (2010). Effects of cultivar, orchard elevation, and storage on fruit quality characters of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.). Scientia Horticulturae 125:301-304.

Fleckinger J (1960). Phénologie et arboriculture fruitière. In: Le Bon Jardinier, Ed Maison rustique, Paris, pp 362-372.

Fotiric Akšic M, Nikolic T (2013). Analysis of pomological traits in new promising sweet cherry genotypes. Genetika 45(3):873-880.

García F, Frutos D, Lopez G, Carrillo A, Cos J (2014). Flowering of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) cultivars in Cieza, Murcia, Spain. Acta Horticulturae 1020:191-196.

Ghimicescu G (1977). The chemistry and analysis of food, beverages and spices [in Romanian]. Ed Junimea, Ia?i.

Gradinariu G, Istrate M (2003). Special crop of fruit growing trees [in Romanian]. Ed Matrix Rom, Bucure?ti.

Jayaprakasha GK, Singh RP, Sakariah KK (2001). Antioxidant activity of grape seed (Vitis vinifera) extracted on peroxidation models in vitro. Food Chemistry 73:285-290.

Jänes H, Ardel P, Kahu K, Kelt K, Kikas A (2010). Some biological properties and fruit quality parameters of new sweet cherry cultivars and perspective selections. Agronomy Research 8(Sp Iss III):583-588.

Kask K, Jänes H, Libek A, Arus L, Kikas A, Kaldmäe H, Univer N, Univer T (2010). New cultivars and future perspectives in professional fruit breeding in Estonia. Agronomy Research 8(Sp Iss III):603-614.

Kim DO, Heo HJ, Kim YJ, Yang HS, Lee CY (2005). Sweet and sour cherry phenolics and their protective effects on neuronal cells. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 53(26):9921-9927.

Meland M, Kaiser C, Christensen MJ (2014). Physical and chemical methods to avoid fruit cracking in cherry. AgroLife Scientific Journal 3(1):177-183.

Milatovic D (2011). Breeding and cultivars in cherry. In: Sweet and sour cherry tree [in Serbian]. Ed Nau?no vo?arsko društvo Srbije, ?a?ak, Srbije pp 119-213.

Melichácová S, Timoracká M, Bystrická J, Vollmannová A, Cér YJ (2010). Relation of total antiradical activity and total polyphenol content of sweet cherries (Prunus avium L.) and tart cherries (Prunus cerasus L.). Acta Agriculturae Slovenica 95(1):21-28.

Petre L, Sîrbu S, Iurea E (2007). Physical, chemical and technological features of fruits for the cherry breeds and hybrid elites created at RSFG iasi, romania. Lucrari Stiintifice USAMV Iasi, Series Horticulture 50:603-610.

Prskavec K, Kloutvor J (1986). 30 years survey of spring frost occurrence during cherry blossom period. In: New Trends in Cherry Growing. Sempra, Praga.

Sansavini S, Lugli S (2008). Sweet cherry breeding programs in Europe and Asia. Acta Horticulturae 795:41-57.

Schuster M, Grafe C, Wolfram B, Schmidt H (2014). Cultivars resulting from cherry breeding in Germany. Erwerbs-Obstbau 56(2):67-72.

Sen F, Oksar RE, Golkarian M, Yaldiz S (2014). Quality changes of different sweet cherry cultivars at various stages of the supply chain. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici 42(2):501-506.

Skrzynski J, Leja M, Gonkiewicz A, Banach P (2016). Cultivar effect on the sweet cherry antioxidant and some chemical attributes. Folia Horticulturae 28(1):95-102.

UPOV (2006). Sweet Cherry (Prunus avium L.). Guidelines for the conduct of tests for distinctness, uniformity and stability. TG 35/7 UPOV Geneva.




How to Cite

IUREA, E., SIRBU, S., CORNEANU, M., BUTAC, M., TITIRICĂ, I., & MILITARU, M. (2018). Assessment of Some Sweet Cherry Cultivars in Comparison with Their Genitors under the Conditions of the North-Eastern Area of Romania. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 47(1), 207–212.



Research Articles
DOI: 10.15835/nbha47111240